Orchestras have become used to the emphasis on the separation of layers, of the ultimate precision and clarity.

The music I turn out these days is the kind of music I want to hear myself.

I discovered that the people of the North are different and there's no way you can make a person from the North similar to a Southerner. They're two different worlds.

The players never think they project enough. In a hall that seats 3,300 people, it's a very scary thing to play so quietly that you can barely hear yourself.

The Royal Festival Hall in London is nice; people hang out there. I think this inviting, non-exclusive character is very important.

Orchestras have become used to the emphasis on the separation of layers, of the ultimate precision and clarity.

I don't believe in an annual dose of film music for the sake of it being film music. If we program film music, it will be because there is a real artistic reason for doing so.

Once you get over the first hill, there is always a new, higher one lurking, of course.

Stravinsky is masterly: his harmony is conceived so precisely that it can only be the way it is.

The underlying process in Northern music tends to be slower and continuous, whatever's happening on the surface; in Southern music the underlying process is always faster.

I've learned a lot from the masters of orchestration, like Ravel and Stravinsky.

Every day we make more progress toward understanding the concert hall.

As we watch TV or films, there are no organic transitions, only edits. The idea of A becoming B, rather than A jumping to B, has become foreign.

The act of conducting in itself, of waving my arms in the air and being in charge, I didn't miss. I missed the sensual pleasure of being in contact with music.

There is such a suspicion in today's world of people who do more than one thing, who aren't specialized.

This continuity of sound and form was something that I became really interested in from working with Ligeti. He was always going on about how form has to be continuous.

Anyone who composes and conducts at the same time is immediately suspect, because he must be faking one or the other.

This conducting thing happened. In 1983 I was sucked into this international career, which was a very scary experience.

In Europe, there is so much tradition, and everyone has established ideas as to what art should be and what it has always been.

I love a visceral sound, the kind that hits you in the belly.

There will have to be times when I'm not conducting because I'm composing. I haven't solved that problem, and perhaps I never will.

With American orchestras, in particular, because they play in such huge halls, getting a true pianissimo is very hard.

My music wouldn't sound the way it does if I hadn't had the experience of conducting.

The sound was my greatest concern. There were certain difficulties getting used to the way every musician can hear his or herself, the way each of them relates to the musician in the next seat.

I can't imagine how many first performances I've done, perhaps 500. Some of them have been very good, and some of course very bad.

Los Angeles is just a more open place. The way L.A. functions is that people give you a forum. They say, Show us what you can do.

I'm still disturbed if a chord isn't together, but your priorities change as you get older.

After working with Ligeti I began to hear Brahms and Beethoven differently.

This country, and the West Coast, especially, is bad at preserving any cultural legacy.

If the seams are showing, there is something wrong with the performance or the construction of the piece. This idea is completely at odds with our modern visual experience, because everything today is based on montage.

Music has just as much to do with movement and body as it does soul and intellect.

In the range of music that we play - roughly 300 years' worth-there really are more similarities than differences.

Pulse as an active means of expression, Stravinsky and Beethoven are the two masters of that.

The Northern idea of form is more of a process. The various units of the form overlap. You can't tell where some things stop and new things start. This is typical of Sibelius.

I always had, deep down, a slight aversion toward the purely cerebral in music.

When we're at the end of The Rite of Spring or of a Bruckner symphony, I want people to feel the music physically.

I feel very free and very happy to be a composer.

There is more openness in LA to possibilities than on the East Coast of America. There is a pioneering spirit there that stems from the reason people went out there in the first place-to find something new.

I must stress here the point that I appreciate clarity, order, meaning, structure, rationality: they are necessary to whatever provisional stability we have, and they can be the agents of gradual and successful change.

I experience a period of frightening clarity in those moments when nature is so beautiful. I am no longer sure of myself, and the paintings appear as in a dream.

For me the greatest beauty always lies in the greatest clarity.

Orchestras have become used to the emphasis on the separation of layers, of the ultimate precision and clarity.

Gratitude unlocks the fullness of life. It turns what we have into enough, and more. It turns denial into acceptance, chaos to order, confusion to clarity. It can turn a meal into a feast, a house into a home, a stranger into a friend.

When you take a pitch and line it somewhere, it's like you've thought of something and put it there with beautiful clarity.

You could write a song about some kind of emotional problem you are having, but it would not be a good song, in my eyes, until it went through a period of sensitivity to a moment of clarity. Without that moment of clarity to contribute to the song, it's just complaining.

Although our intellect always longs for clarity and certainty, our nature often finds uncertainty fascinating.

Anything well written with good language and clarity and honesty is worth doing. It comes out of the same tradition as Shakespeare.

They place great stress on the clarity of our language for expressing nuances and showing subtleties.

When I speak of the beauty of a game of chess, then naturally this is subjective. Beauty can be found in a very technical, mathematical game for example. That is the beauty of clarity.