Neither with those nor with the others, with all I agree and dissent; in all part of truth and part of error must be seen.

Lutherans, whose arguments and mistakes will not be difficult to contest or discover, do not want to attribute any value to works, and they do not understand enough the scope of the justification.

Only he shakes the heavens and from its treasures takes our the winds. He joins the waters and the clouds and produces the rain. He does all those things. Only he realizes miracles permanently.

Nothing can be found in the intellect if previously has not been found in the senses.

The French are endowed with bigger limbs; those of the Spaniards are stronger; they have a very slim waist. The French fight with more ferocity than advise. The Spaniards the opposite.

I do not separate Christ from God more than a voice from the speaker or a beam from the sun. Christ is the voice of the speaker. He and the Father are the same thing, as the beam and the light, are the same light.

Man becomes weak or ill by accident as a consequence of the lack of resources. Even the most severally ill patients must be treated with the aim of restoring their health.

No one with a body full of aliments can have a luminous soul and other intellectual faculties. It is necessary to care for the body if we wish the spirit to function normally.

May the Lord destroy all the tyrants of the church. Amen.

And because his Spirit was wholly God, he is called God, and he is called man on account of his flesh.

In the inhalation and exhalation there is an energy and a lively divine spirit, since He, through his spirit supports the breath of life, giving courage to the people who are in the earth and spirit to those who walk on it.

It is an invention of the devil, an infernal falsity for the destruction of all Christianity.

There is therefore a tremendous mystery in the fact that God may be united with man and the man with God.

To kill a man is not to defend a doctrine, but to kill a man.

Neither with those nor with the others, with all I agree and dissent; in all part of truth and part of error must be seen.

I will burn, but this is a mere event. We shall continue our discussion in eternity.

Do not be surprised if I adore as God what you called humanity, since you talked of humanity as if it was empty of spirit and you think in the flesh according to the flesh.

God gave us the mind so that we can know him.

May God in his mercy enable us without obstinacy to perceive our errors.

Jesus, Son of the Eternal God, have mercy on me.

Will dissent be permitted? The answer to that question will determine whether the society is a free society or a fear society.

Dissent is the highest form of patriotism.

May we never confuse honest dissent with disloyal subversion.

Down through the centuries, this trick has been tried by various establishments throughout the world. They force people to get involved in the kind of examination that has only one aim and that is to stamp out dissent.

People may believe that there can be a society where dissent is not permitted, but which is nonetheless not a fear society because everyone agrees with one another and therefore no one wants to dissent.

In contrast, fear societies are societies in which dissent is banned.

Throughout the lead-up to the war, CNN worked hard to air all sides of the story. We had a regular segment called Voices of Dissent in which we spent time covering antiwar protests and interviewing those who were opposed to the war with Iraq.

No matter that patriotism is too often the refuge of scoundrels. Dissent, rebellion, and all-around hell-raising remain the true duty of patriots.

Free societies are societies in which the right of dissent is protected.

It's so easy for propaganda to work, and dissent to be mocked.

Freedom is hammered out on the anvil of discussion, dissent, and debate.

Science exists, moreover, only as a journey toward troth. Stifle dissent and you end that journey.

In a democracy, dissent is an act of faith.

Here in America we are descended in blood and in spirit from revolutionists and rebels - men and women who dare to dissent from accepted doctrine. As their heirs, may we never confuse honest dissent with disloyal subversion.

Dissent is the native activity of the scientist, and it has got him into a good deal of trouble in the last years. But if that is cut off, what is left will not be a scientist. And I doubt whether it will be a man.

A dissenting minority feels free only when it can impose its will on the majority: what it abominates most is the dissent of the majority.

In a democracy dissent is an act of faith. Like medicine, the test of its value is not in its taste, but in its effects.

We must not confuse dissent with disloyalty. When the loyal opposition dies, I think the soul of America dies with it.

We may be so eager to protect the right to dissent that we lose sight of the difference between dissent and subversion.

Neither with those nor with the others, with all I agree and dissent; in all part of truth and part of error must be seen.

It's much easier to make jokes about sensitive issues if there is some dissent, some conflict.

Discussion in America means dissent.

So now is the time, more than ever, for those who truly value all the principles of democracy, especially including dissent, to be the most forceful in speaking up, standing up and speaking out.

The rightful claim to dissent is an existential right of the individual.

Has there ever been a society which has died of dissent? Several have died of conformity in our lifetime.

Those who begin coercive elimination of dissent soon find themselves exterminating dissenters. Compulsory unification of opinion achieves only the unanimity of the graveyard.

There are men - now in power in this country - who do not respect dissent, who cannot cope with turmoil, and who believe that the people of America are ready to support repression as long as it is done with a quiet voice and a business suit.

The corporate grip on opinion in the United States is one of the wonders of the Western world. No First World country has ever managed to eliminate so entirely from its media all objectivity - much less dissent.

When a man fails to see the truth of certain generally accepted views, there is no law compelling him to provoke animosity by announcing his dissent.