Certainly going back to Sherlock Holmes we have a tradition of forensic science featured in detective stories.

You think publishing is tough but the music world is ten times tougher.

For me a thriller is a very carefully structured story.

It means working harder to do the research but I don't really mind - I don't think I have what it takes to chase criminals through back alleys and wade through blood at crime scenes.

I've often said that there's no such thing as writer's block; the problem is idea block.

Trying to write books with a subject matter or in a genre or style you're not familiar with is the best way to find the Big Block looming.

My books are primarily plot driven but the best plot in the world is useless if you don't populate them with characters that readers can care about.

But one does not make living writing poetry unless you're a professor, and one frankly doesn't get a lot of girls as a poet.

I write pretty much anywhere - on planes, in hotel rooms, anywhere in my house.

To answer that I have to describe what I think is my responsibility as a thriller writer: To give my readers the most exciting roller coaster ride of a suspense story I can possibly think of.

When you work alone, you need to socialize at some level.

Generally my typical books have lots of twists and turns a big surprise ending and then usually another surprise at the end and ideally, as in Garden of Beasts, we get to the very end and we find at the last few pages that there's yet another surprise.

The recent fascination, I think, reflects the shift in approach by law enforcement officials to embrace technology as wholeheartedly as the rest of the world.

Of course, I write crime stories, and I have to describe violence and the aftermath of violence.

When it comes time to write the book itself I'll shut the lights out, picture the scene I'm about to write then close my eyes and go at it. Yes, I can touch type.

I like the way words go together and I like the gamesmanship of writing poetry. It is such a challenge.

Hardcover books are fairly expensive these days and to read one requires a significant commitment of time in our busy society. So I want to make sure that when readers buy one of my books they get something they're familiar with.

In suspense novels even subplots about relationships have to have conflict.

The best way to learn about writing is to study the work of other writers you admire.

I spend about eight months researching and outlining my book.

Readers are paramount. I live to write books for them.

Ideally, I like to integrate the human issues into the suspense story itself.

Of course, all writers draw upon their personal experiences in describing day-to-day life and human relationships, but I tend to keep my own experiences largely separate from my stories.

I was editor of my high school literary magazine and a reporter for the school newspaper.

The easy answer is that writing novels is a lot more fun than practicing law.

So I work hard to present the human side of my characters while not neglecting the plot.

The outline is 95 percent of the book. Then I sit down and write, and that's the easy part.

Certainly going back to Sherlock Holmes we have a tradition of forensic science featured in detective stories.

I liked the challenge of writing in a very concise structure in which both meaning and form are important.

Rule one: Write about settings you're familiar with.

If you have a craftsman's command of the language and basic writing techniques you'll be able to write - as long as you know what you want to say.

I've always written, all my life, and when I was very young I developed an interest in poetry.

I also try very hard to create characters - both heroes and villains - with psychological depth.

In other words, the people who populate my books are more than caricatures.

I spend eight months outlining and researching the novel before I begin to write a single word of the prose.

In suspense novels even subplots about relationships have to have conflict.

We have years to converse with someone, to blurt and rant, to explain our desires and anger and regrets - and oh how we squander those moments.

Teachers started recognizing me and praising me for being smart in science and that made me want to be even smarter in science!

This means that to entrust to science - or to deliberate control according to scientific principles - more than scientific method can achieve may have deplorable effects.

Research is of considerable importance in certain fields, such as science and history.

The fact that it's science fiction gives you the license to do anything you want to do.

Statistics is the grammar of science.

I love biomedical science, I love astronomy, and you can't really do much with those in a fantasy setting.

Learn about the world, the way it works, any kind of science and anthropology, it's really an interesting place we live in. Evolution is a really fantastic idea, even more than the idea of God I think.

The problem with allowing God a role in the history of life is not that science would cease, but rather that scientists would have to acknowledge the existence of something important which is outside the boundaries of natural science.

Scientists tend to be skeptical, but the weakness of the community of science is that it tends to move into preformed establishment modes that say this is the only way of doing science, the only valid view.

To my mind, the most important aspect of the Nobel Awards is that they bring home to the masses of the peoples of all nations, a realization of their common interests. They carry to those who have no direct contact with science the international spirit.

There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance.

We especially need imagination in science.