As soon as you go into any biological process in any real detail, you discover it's open-ended in terms of what needs to be found out about it.

By the time I was 12 or 13, I was studying biochemistry textbooks.

I don't believe anybody can really grasp everything that's even in one textbook.

We are all very individual. You have to find out what you can do best, and be self-conscious about that.

I'm chairing a UNESCO committee on how to improve global Internet communications for science; help third-world people get onto the Net so they can be part of the process.

Everybody has to learn for the first time.

I started on the use of the Internet for scientific communication. Our research group was one of the very first to make really systematic use of it as a way of managing research projects.

To have the recognition of your colleagues is great. The public attention is a mixed blessing.

If it takes you 20 or 25 years to establish yourself in one field, you really ought to be careful not to stray too far.

I did get a very fine education, and not just in science. It took some pressure on the part of my elders to convince me that I really should take an interest in humanities.

I think we have to believe we are here for some purpose, and I know there are many cynics who will deny it, but they don't live as if they deny it.

I hope I've lived a life of science whose style will encourage younger people.

I believe I am a person with unusual talents. I think I'd be a liar or stupid if I were to deny that.

If you want to solve very complex problems, you will have to end up letting machines work out a lot of the details for themselves, and in ways that we don't understand what they are doing.

I got my Nobel Prize for my lab work.

I was making a lot of momentous personal decisions. I was still very very young: when the prize was awarded, I was 33; the work I had done when I was 21.

When I was in high school, I became interested in cytochemistry: chemical analysis under the microscope, and trying to understand the composition of cells.

I have many shortcomings. I feel very lucky to have been able to have what I've had.

Life's a hobby.

As soon as you go into any biological process in any real detail, you discover it's open-ended in terms of what needs to be found out about it.

Being successful at a very young age gave me the confidence and the capability to try out other things.

I'm not easily inhibited by the fact that I don't know something about a subject. It doesn't stop me from dabbling in it.

My ambitions were already very clearly fixed by the time I was 6 or 7.

A Swedish newspaper reporter called and said, You've been awarded the Prize. I was quite sure it was a practical joke.

All of civility depends on being able to contain the rage of individuals.

Try hard to find out what you're good at and what your passions are, and where the two converge, and build your life around that.

I was reading five or six years ahead of my grade during public school. I was pretty bored. I made a contract with some of my teachers that if I didn't ask too many questions, I could work in the back of the room.

I'd like to put in a vote for the intrinsic fascination of science.

If you wanted to dissect the structure of living cells, genetic analysis was an extremely powerful method, so my interest turned to that.

If we have isolated individuals able to inflict enormous harm, imagine what a single lunatic can do with a nuclear weapon. I think the whole base of civil society is at risk.

If lifespan jumps by 30 or 40 years, that has enormous implications.

So many of the things I've predicted were technologies that were just sitting right in front of us.

Although I am a public figure, I'm still a little shy. I don't think my own personality is important. I prefer to keep some small dosage of privacy.

I get curious about new things. My real strength is going into a field that has not been investigated before, and finding new approaches to it.

I wish I had a talent for dropping things as well as taking on new ones. It gets to be quite a clutter after a while.

I certainly saw science as a kind of calling, and one with as much legitimacy as a religious calling.

Consistency is found in that work whose whole and detail are suitable to the occasion. It arises from circumstance, custom, and nature.

I never regret anything. Because every little detail of your life is what made you into who you are in the end.

The difference between something good and something great is attention to detail.

I suppose that I was a kind of consultant for taste. Is it good taste? Or bad taste? I had an attention to detail, to what would tell best the story. Because many people get excited about the work and drift off from the story.

A lot of our entertainment throws into detail the stagnation and illness of how we live today-it's sad and it's sick... and it's profitable.

There are a lot of times that if a detail in a scene or a beat, feels unnatural, they'll allow me to explore another direction to go until we're all comfortable with what we are doing.

The day Tarzan opened in London, I sat in a hotel room and discussed the project in detail.

If you take a book of a thousand pages on the Second World War, in which 50 million people died, the concentration camps occupy two pages and the gas chambers ten or 15 lines, and that's what one calls a detail.

In writing a series of stories about the same characters, plan the whole series in advance in some detail, to avoid contradictions and inconsistencies.

We are going to have a huge Oscar issue, you are going to see everything in such beautiful detail.

I won't go into detail but this animated one, the story line is very cool and the kids seem to love it.

My writing style is very sensual, as in sensory detail.

To create something exceptional, your mindset must be relentlessly focused on the smallest detail.