I'm chairing a UNESCO committee on how to improve global Internet communications for science; help third-world people get onto the Net so they can be part of the process.

By the time I was 12 or 13, I was studying biochemistry textbooks.

I don't believe anybody can really grasp everything that's even in one textbook.

We are all very individual. You have to find out what you can do best, and be self-conscious about that.

I'm chairing a UNESCO committee on how to improve global Internet communications for science; help third-world people get onto the Net so they can be part of the process.

Everybody has to learn for the first time.

I started on the use of the Internet for scientific communication. Our research group was one of the very first to make really systematic use of it as a way of managing research projects.

To have the recognition of your colleagues is great. The public attention is a mixed blessing.

If it takes you 20 or 25 years to establish yourself in one field, you really ought to be careful not to stray too far.

I did get a very fine education, and not just in science. It took some pressure on the part of my elders to convince me that I really should take an interest in humanities.

I think we have to believe we are here for some purpose, and I know there are many cynics who will deny it, but they don't live as if they deny it.

I hope I've lived a life of science whose style will encourage younger people.

I believe I am a person with unusual talents. I think I'd be a liar or stupid if I were to deny that.

If you want to solve very complex problems, you will have to end up letting machines work out a lot of the details for themselves, and in ways that we don't understand what they are doing.

I got my Nobel Prize for my lab work.

I was making a lot of momentous personal decisions. I was still very very young: when the prize was awarded, I was 33; the work I had done when I was 21.

When I was in high school, I became interested in cytochemistry: chemical analysis under the microscope, and trying to understand the composition of cells.

I have many shortcomings. I feel very lucky to have been able to have what I've had.

Life's a hobby.

As soon as you go into any biological process in any real detail, you discover it's open-ended in terms of what needs to be found out about it.

Being successful at a very young age gave me the confidence and the capability to try out other things.

I'm not easily inhibited by the fact that I don't know something about a subject. It doesn't stop me from dabbling in it.

My ambitions were already very clearly fixed by the time I was 6 or 7.

A Swedish newspaper reporter called and said, You've been awarded the Prize. I was quite sure it was a practical joke.

All of civility depends on being able to contain the rage of individuals.

Try hard to find out what you're good at and what your passions are, and where the two converge, and build your life around that.

I was reading five or six years ahead of my grade during public school. I was pretty bored. I made a contract with some of my teachers that if I didn't ask too many questions, I could work in the back of the room.

I'd like to put in a vote for the intrinsic fascination of science.

If you wanted to dissect the structure of living cells, genetic analysis was an extremely powerful method, so my interest turned to that.

If we have isolated individuals able to inflict enormous harm, imagine what a single lunatic can do with a nuclear weapon. I think the whole base of civil society is at risk.

If lifespan jumps by 30 or 40 years, that has enormous implications.

So many of the things I've predicted were technologies that were just sitting right in front of us.

Although I am a public figure, I'm still a little shy. I don't think my own personality is important. I prefer to keep some small dosage of privacy.

I get curious about new things. My real strength is going into a field that has not been investigated before, and finding new approaches to it.

I wish I had a talent for dropping things as well as taking on new ones. It gets to be quite a clutter after a while.

I certainly saw science as a kind of calling, and one with as much legitimacy as a religious calling.

And yes, there's a simplicity to writing books because you're not a member of a team, so you make all the decisions yourself instead of deferring to a committee.

One of the great joys this year and the year before has been how all of the people in this body, men and women, Republicans and Democrats, have worked together so well with our chairman and the chairman of the full committee to address the issues of housing for our soldiers.

If the many allegations made to this date are true, then the burglars who broke into the headquarters of the Democratic National Committee at the Watergate were, in effect, breaking into the home of every citizen.

Obama's health care plan will be written by a committee whose head, John Conyers, says he doesn't understand it. It'll be passed by Congress that has not read it, signed by a president who smokes, funded by a Treasury chief who didn't pay his taxes, overseen by a Surgeon General who is obese, and financed by a country that's nearly broke. What could possibly go wrong?

Our greatest privilege and responsibility as leaders of the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs is to provide our veterans with a system that cares for their wounds and ensures that they have an opportunity to succeed.

To do so, we are creating a Fairness for Switzerland Committee that will not only disseminate some of the facts, but also protect a relationship that is important to all of us in North America.

If I were John Bolton, I'd take great consolation in the words of my principal supporter on the committee, who gave a ringing endorsement, which was, There is no evidence that he has broken any laws.

I am persuaded, that if any attempt is made to improve the education of the poor, and such an unmanly spirit should guide the resolution of a society or committee for that purpose, it would render the design abortive.

Madam Speaker, I have spent more than half my life as a member of the Resources Committee. In that time I have supported numerous wilderness designations. In fact, I cannot recall ever opposing a wilderness bill.

The SSRC committee turned attention from team research for building a model of the United States to doing one for world trade in order to investigate the international transmission mechanism.

There were no gifts. Everything is properly accounted for. I provided testimony and evidence to the committee... This was all stuff that was previously known.

People just want to hear some common sense... and I bring to bear the experience in local government and state government and national government - I was the first woman in history on the Senate Finance Committee - not to mention the diplomatic international experience.

Nothing is really media driven or committee driven, so you can actually just produce something.