By the 2030s, the nonbiological portion of our intelligence will predominate.

By the 2030s, the nonbiological portion of our intelligence will predominate.

I'm an inventor. I became interested in long-term trends because an invention has to make sense in the world in which it is finished, not the world in which it is started.

Death gives meaning to our lives. It gives importance and value to time. Time would become meaningless if there were too much of it.

We appear to be programmed with the idea that there are 'things' outside of our self, and some are conscious, and some are not.

We are beginning to see intimations of this in the implantation of computer devices into the human body.

A successful person isn't necessarily better than her less successful peers at solving problems; her pattern-recognition facilities have just learned what problems are worth solving.

Even by common wisdom, there seem to be both people and objects in my dream that are outside myself, but clearly they were created in myself and are part of me, they are mental constructs in my own brain.

I consider myself an inventor, entrepreneur, and author.

As order exponentially increases, time exponentially speeds up.

Supercomputers will achieve one human brain capacity by 2010, and personal computers will do so by about 2020.

A lot of movies about artificial intelligence envision that AI's will be very intelligent but missing some key emotional qualities of humans and therefore turn out to be very dangerous.

All different forms of human expression, art, science, are going to become expanded, by expanding our intelligence.

Artificial intelligence will reach human levels by around 2029. Follow that out further to, say, 2045, we will have multiplied the intelligence, the human biological machine intelligence of our civilization a billion-fold.

Biology is a software process. Our bodies are made up of trillions of cells, each governed by this process. You and I are walking around with outdated software running in our bodies, which evolved in a very different era.

By 2029, computers will have emotional intelligence and be convincing as people.

By the time we get to the 2040s, we'll be able to multiply human intelligence a billionfold. That will be a profound change that's singular in nature. Computers are going to keep getting smaller and smaller. Ultimately, they will go inside our bodies and brains and make us healthier, make us smarter.

Doing real world projects is, I think, the best way to learn and also to engage the world and find out what the world is all about.

I decided to be an inventor when I was five. My parents had given me a few various enrichment toys like erector sets, and for some reason I had the idea that if I put things together just the right way, I could create the intended effect.

I think we are evolving rapidly into one world culture. It's certainly one world economy. With billions of people online, I think we'll appreciate the wisdom in many different traditions as we learn more about them. People were very isolated and didn't know anything about other religions 100 years ago.

I'm working on artificial intelligence. Actually, natural language understanding, which is to get computers to understand the meaning of documents.

If we look at the life cycle of technologies, we see an early period of over-enthusiasm, then a 'bust' when disillusionment sets in, followed by the real revolution.

Information defines your personality, your memories, your skills.

Life expectancy is a statistical phenomenon. You could still be hit by the proverbial bus tomorrow.

My mission at Google is to develop natural language understanding with a team and in collaboration with other researchers at Google.

No matter what problem you encounter, whether it's a grand challenge for humanity or a personal problem of your own, there's an idea out there that can overcome it. And you can find that idea.

Our intuition about the future is linear. But the reality of information technology is exponential, and that makes a profound difference. If I take 30 steps linearly, I get to 30. If I take 30 steps exponentially, I get to a billion.

Our technology, our machines, is part of our humanity. We created them to extend ourselves, and that is what is unique about human beings.

People say we're running out of energy. That's only true if we stick with these old 19th century technologies. We are awash in energy from the sunlight.

What we spend our time on is probably the most important decision we make.

When you talk to a human in 2035, you'll be talking to someone that's a combination of biological and non-biological intelligence.

A lot of movies about artificial intelligence envision that AIs will be very intelligent but missing some key emotional qualities of humans and therefore turn out to be very dangerous.

Biology is a software process. Our bodies are made up of trillions of cells each governed by this process. You and I are walking around with outdated software running in our bodies which evolved in a very different era.

Launching a breakthrough idea is like shooting skeet. Peoples needs change so you must aim well ahead of the target to hit it.

Mobile phones are misnamed. They should be called gateways to human knowledge.

Emotional intelligence is what humans are good at and thats not a sideshow. Thats the cutting edge of human intelligence.

By 2029 computers will have emotional intelligence and be convincing as people.

Machines will follow a path that mirrors the evolution of humans. Ultimately, however, self-aware, self-improving machines will evolve beyond humans' ability to control or even understand them.

Play is just another version of work.

The telephone is virtual reality in that you can meet with someone as if you are together, at least for the auditory sense.

There is little evidence that our individual intelligence has improved through recorded history.

The intelligence of the lower forms of animal life, like a great deal of human intelligence, does not involve a self.

The Germans certainly - the intelligence service believed that there were WMD. It turns out that we were all wrong, probably in my judgment, and that is most disturbing.

I have met with some of them - very honest fellows, who, with all their stupidity, had a kind of intelligence and an upright good sense, which cannot be the characteristics of fools.

The Gorillaz cartoons seem more real to me than the actual people on TV. Because at least you know that there's some intelligence behind the cartoons, and there's a lot of work that's gone into it, so it can't all be just a lie.

The Clinton White House today said they would start to give national security and intelligence briefings to George Bush. I don't know how well this is working out. Today after the first one Bush said, 'I've got one question: What color is the red phone?'

I wasn't privy to all of the intelligence that was coming in about Guatemala, but I did see the traffic that was coming in from Guatemala City, because it was very relevant to me, and of course I exchanged what I had with the chief of station in Guatemala City.

The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in mind at the same time and still retain the ability to function.

A government for the people must depend for its success on the intelligence, the morality, the justice, and the interest of the people themselves.