Feminists have confused opportunity with outcome.

Nobody really believes in equality anyway.

Men are often a lot less vindictive than women are, because we are rejected constantly every day.

All women's issues are to some degree men's issues and all men's issues are to some degree women's issues because when either sex wins unilaterally both sexes lose.

It evolved from my experience in the fifties, growing up during the McCarthy era, and hearing a lot of assumptions that America was wonderful and Communism was terrible.

For example, the equivalent of a woman being treated as a sex object is a man being treated as a success object.

Feminists have confused opportunity with outcome.

One can make a case that says that since 85% of children being brought up in single family homes are being brought up by women that about 85% of elementary school teachers should be males to balance out the feminization that the boys and girls receive.

When women hold off from marrying men, we call it independence. When men hold off from marrying women, we call it fear of commitment.

The Myth of Male Power dealt much more with the political issues, the legal issues, sexual harassment, date rape, women who kill, and those issues were very much more interfaced with the agendas of feminism.

In America and in most of the industrialized world, men are coming to be thought of by feminists in very much the same way that Jews were thought of by early Nazis. The comparison is overwhelmingly scary.

You could make a case that women addicted men to their sexuality and then withdrew their sexuality until we provided them with a source of income.

Men's competitive team sports focus on the balance between individual achievement and team achievement with the emphasis on team achievement.

Our main reasons for fearing males having sex with males is that you really had to construct a more powerful social role to keep men in their place than you did to keep women in their place.

When a man is able to connect with his feelings, he is able to care more.

So we've moved from an era when women's biology was women's destiny to today, which is an era in which men's biology is men's destiny.

I started to get very well recognized in the early seventies as the only man in the United States who had been elected three times to the board of NOW in New York City.

In fact, the socialization gives us the tools to fill our evolutionary roles. They are our building blocks.

And then in 1956 or 1957 my family went over to Europe and I moved over with them, and immediately people in Europe thought my perspective on that issue was 100% correct.

Throughout my life I have always been amazed that people couldn't listen to other people, that they couldn't hear their best intent, that there seemed to be an enormous need to demonize.

Men don't oppress women any more than women oppress men.

And we reduce almost all male-female problems by working on both the female and the male. And that usually means having both sexes take responsibility.

The only men who aren't in fear of women's reactions are usually men who aren't born or who are dead.

And with the rape, I was showing why the rape statistics are exaggerated, and saying that date rape was much more complex than the way feminists had portrayed it, as men oppressing women.

I don't think there's anything that is a greater area of discrimination against women today than the fact that nowhere in the world is there a female role model in team sports that more than half of a general audience would recognize.

A 2001 survey of business owners with MBAs conducted by the Rochester Institute of Technology found that money was the primary motivator for only 29% of women, versus 76% of men. Women prioritized flexibility, fulfillment, autonomy and safety.

A man perceives himself as owning and being owned by a woman.

A man's primary fantasy is access to a variety of attractive women without the fear of rejection.

A woman with organizing skills can run a construction company without ever picking up a hammer and nail.

After years of research, I discovered 25 differences in the work-life choices of men and women. All 25 lead to men earning more money, but to women having better lives.

Because of the feminist perspective, we have gotten a view of the world that is distorted.

Boys with a 'failure to launch' are invisible to most girls. With poor social skills, the boys feel anger at their fear of being rejected and self-loathing at their inability to compete.

Companies like I.B.M. have offered women scholarships to study engineering for years, and women engineers routinely get higher starting salaries than men.

Feminists who say that I switched sides because I am an opportunist should know that exactly the opposite is true. It's cost me a lot of money. I've gone from being well-to-do to being $70,000 in debt. I have done something self-destructive financially. I could only do it because I don't have to support a wife and child.

Financial analysts make a lot more than accountants.

For blacks in our society, victimization may be a true issue. But it isn't a true issue for women. Neither men nor women are victimized. The true issue, that I try to point out, is that both sexes suffer restricted roles.

I am always someone who follows the research more than my self-interest. It certainly has not been in my self-interest to defend men. I've gone from being quite wealthy, when I was defending women, to being quite poor defending men.

I define power as 'control over one's life.' A balanced life is far superior to the male definition of power: earning money someone else spends while he dies sooner.

I definitely agree with choices for women, but I do not agree with choices for women when they eliminate choices for men. Rather, I think that the sexes need to make choices that lead to the maximum amount of win-win for both sexes.

I don't have children that I've lost in a bitter custody dispute. But I see an enormous wound in kids due to a lack of their dads.

I found that women entrepreneurs earn 50% less than their male counterparts.

I realized that women's liberation is men's liberation, too.

I'm a great supporter of women who take risks and don't make victimhood into an art. It's not good for women, and it's not good for men. Too many men put all their emotional eggs in one basket - a woman's basket.

I'm an awfully loyal friend. Once I've started a relationship with someone, it's like they are syrup and I'm a pancake. Their syrup gets into my pancake, so to speak.

I'm not saying that men make better fathers than women do mothers.

I've always been motivated to stop people from doing dysfunctional things.

I've gone from being quite wealthy, when I was defending women, to being quite poor defending men.

If a man belittles a woman, it could become a lawsuit. If women belittle men, it's a Hallmark card.

Is there discrimination against women? Yes, like the old boys' network. And sometimes discrimination against women becomes discrimination against men: in hazardous fields, women suffer fewer hazards.